Types of Time Travel to the Past

For my own reference (and that of anyone else who's interested), I'm listing the types of time travel to the past that I'm aware of. Any other thoughts or things I've missed, let me know.

It Changes the Past

This is the most straightforward. You go to the past, and every action has a cascading effect on the future. Butterfly effect and all. And it's why, as Hawking said, time travel to the past isn't possible -- because every action changes the future which changes the action of the person who went to the past, which changes the future, etc., an infinite feedback loop resulting in travel to the past never being accomplished.

But, continuing in theory anyway....

It Can Change Minor Events, But Not Major Events

Like water droplets flowing through a pipe, each drop of water may move wherever it wants. But, ultimately, the flow of water will end up in the same place due to the constraints of the pipe. 

Thus, in this view, some unknown force causes major events to happen regardless of what changes happen in the past.

It Causes the Events of the Present

This is similar to the previous one, or maybe even the same as the previous one. Here, going to the past causes the events of the present, like the two are some interwoven tapestry. And trying to change an event of the present is impossible.

The classic example is that of trying to stop the Holocaust by going back in time and killing Hitler as an infant. The person goes back, finds the Hitler family, and kills the baby in his crib. But his mother, finding the child, takes him and sneaks into her neighbor's house, who also happened to have a baby boy at about the same time, and exchanges her dead baby for the neighbor's live one. The neighbor's baby then turns out to be Hitler. So the time traveler actually caused the events of the future, rather than stopping them.

It Creates Alternate Realities

This one is very common in science fiction. A person goes to the past, and reality splits in two -- one with the original timeline, and another with the new timeline with the changed events -- and the two timelines exist side-by-side, neither one being aware of the other.

Frankly, I find this view to be absurd. I mean, why should the timeline split only in one place? If a person goes back to the past, then every action they take changes the future. They step on a bug, and there should be two timelines, one in which the bug lives, and another where the bug dies. They look at someone, and there should be two timelines, one in which the other person looks back at them, and another where the other person keeps walking, looking straight ahead. And so on.

Really, with this view, reality should split into multiple timelines every moment, or whatever the smallest unit of time may be, resulting in an infinite number of timelines by just going back in time for a few seconds. So I find this view to be preposterous.

Comments

Post a Comment

Popular posts from this blog

Thoughts On Growing Old

You spend the first part of your life trying to be old, trying to convince everyone that you're older than you are, that you're just as good -- if not better -- than a grown-up. Then, when you're in your late teens, you put the brakes on trying to be older. Like a wall that you were speeding towards when it was just a speck in the distance, you now start to apply braking pressure to avoid hitting it. At first you only have to touch the brakes a little. You're almost 20, and 30's a long ways off. You barely have to think about it. But then you hit 30, and panic sets in. You start hitting the brakes a little harder, as you realize that that wall that was once so distant and so small is now steadily and quickly racing towards you, and the amount of highway between you and it is getting less and less all the time. But you comfort yourself in knowing that at least you're not 35 yet! But then you hit 35 and you realize that 40's up ahead, and you begin to p
Read more

Reality, What a Concept

I drove down to my local Starbucks a little while ago, only, when I got there, it was closed. It was 11:20, and they closed at 11:00. For some reason, I had thought it was earlier. But, more than being closed, the intersection it was at was completely dark and deserted. Not a single soul around. So I immediately made a U-turn and headed home. It was kind of scary. On my way home, things seemed a little strange, and I took a right turn at a stop sign much faster than I normally would have (in fact, I didn't stop at all). I thought to myself, "This is very strange -- the deserted street, the weird driving -- almost like this isn't real. But I know that this is real, because here I am, driving up the street." I continued this conversation with myself, and whoever might be out there, until finally I said, "If this isn't real, then let me be home right now!" And immediately I woke up. OK, so it was a dream. And we've all had dreams like that, where we thi
Read more

Internet Nakedness

I created a LinkedIn account a few weeks ago. Today I got an e-mail asking me if I knew certain people that I could connect with on LinkedIn. There were six names. Two of them I recognized. One of them was the father of a kid my son played racquetball with a few years back. I don't have any online associations with him at all, except that he's sent me a few e-mails, and I've sent him some. He's not a Twitter or Facebook friend. The other one was someone I know on both Twitter and Facebook, but haven't e-mailed directly. Yet somehow, LinkedIn (a company supposedly separate from Twitter, Facebook, and Google) was able to connect me to these two individuals, recognizing that there was some connection between us. How did it determine those connections? From Gmail? (That might apply to the first one, but not the second.) From Twitter or Facebook? (That would apply to the second, but not to the first.) I don't know, I find this ability of companies to guess
Read more